summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorjoey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071>2007-08-24 20:30:09 +0000
committerjoey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071>2007-08-24 20:30:09 +0000
commit7089ce3631f987300c8bef87fa7850adaa29590e (patch)
treef94257e316d2c631afc51826c1d0dff4d956868f /doc
parentc2ec0a97a1135772e79327b6c3f77f9d78f46990 (diff)
comments on newest version
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/todo/wikiwyg/discussion.mdwn36
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/wikiwyg/discussion.mdwn b/doc/todo/wikiwyg/discussion.mdwn
index 2f99e450a..1014bef6c 100644
--- a/doc/todo/wikiwyg/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/wikiwyg/discussion.mdwn
@@ -53,3 +53,39 @@ A few observations, in approximate order of priority:
Oh, by the way, let me know if I forgot to tarball anything. --[[TaylorKillian]]
[Javascript Compression]: http://javascriptcompressor.com/
+
+---
+
+Some more comments, on version 1.6. You seem to be making nice progress.
+
+changes.diff:
+
+* I don't really like the tarball approach. Doesn't feel like the right
+ approach somehow. A list of underlay directories feels to me like a
+ better approach. One reason is that it's more general than a tarball tied
+ to a given plugin. A list of underlay directories could also be used to
+ prefer a translated underlay, and use the english version of untranslated
+ pages, for example.
+* When is the WIKIWYG variable in misc.tmpl used?
+* I wish there were a good way to move the code to handle saving a part of
+ a page into the plugin. But there doesn't seem to be one that's any
+ cleaner than keeping the code where it is. So I'll probably just apply
+ that hunk.
+* Your patch exports run_hooks, but I don't see the plugin using that.
+* I don't know about exporting pagetitle. So far, only the inline plugin
+ needs to use that function, I generally only export things after it's
+ clear a lot of plugins will need them.
+
+wikiwyg.tar.gz
+
+* Would it be possible to provide a diff between wikiwyg upstream and any
+ modifications you made to its files? I'm not sure which version you used,
+ so I'm seeing changes in diffing that I'm unsure if you made..
+* If the files aren't modified, would it be better for users to get them
+ from the wikiwgy upstream, instead of including them in the plugin? (If so,
+ they'd go in their own Debian package..)
+
+Everything else looks fine and ready for merging. If, that is, you think
+I should include the plugin with all of its java code in ikiwiki. Thoughts?
+
+--[[Joey]]