summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorjoey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071>2007-08-22 02:12:30 +0000
committerjoey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071>2007-08-22 02:12:30 +0000
commit5c3eb4ae5d819b53977772e77928aa4dc7e5de17 (patch)
treeb55d2a49a27d4b17838bf6a4d4db672ccd2105d4 /doc
parentb78b8b81202a1fdb0c56dea01e88acdd9171c504 (diff)
more
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/todo/latex.mdwn7
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/latex.mdwn b/doc/todo/latex.mdwn
index f23f0a254..04eacbad4 100644
--- a/doc/todo/latex.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/latex.mdwn
@@ -175,9 +175,14 @@ Okay, the last version of the tex plugin for ikiwiki can be downloaded [here](ht
> I didn't break the checking code when I did it. It would be nice to write
> a test case that tries to feed it bad code and makes sure it rejects it.
>
-> Question: does it really make sense to have an alt tag for the image
+> Does it really make sense to have an alt tag for the image
> that contains the tex code? Will that make any sense when browsing
> without images?
+>
+> I'm thinking about renameing the preprocessor directive to teximg.
+> \[[teximg code="" alt="foo"]] makes sense.. Would it make sense to rename
+> the whole plugin, or do you think that other tex stuff should go in this
+> same plugin?
>
> Note: I removed the style= attribute, since as I've told you, the
> htmlsanitizer strips those since they can be used to insert javascript. I