diff options
author | joey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071> | 2006-12-07 05:06:59 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | joey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071> | 2006-12-07 05:06:59 +0000 |
commit | 45dc852cd492eeedfb95cabcdaf2cab86bcb31af (patch) | |
tree | 0463ac37365ec9b5b79c0c00f4305a1a915213c1 /doc/todo/discussion_page_as_blog.mdwn | |
parent | 607dcf0f24bfdeaa29d77c8d301472fc815e4077 (diff) |
responses and more thoughts on the issue of discussion pages as blogs
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/todo/discussion_page_as_blog.mdwn')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/discussion_page_as_blog.mdwn | 25 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/discussion_page_as_blog.mdwn b/doc/todo/discussion_page_as_blog.mdwn index eb11caac1..7fb2fda1a 100644 --- a/doc/todo/discussion_page_as_blog.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/discussion_page_as_blog.mdwn @@ -1,6 +1,23 @@ -Look at a discussion page here or eg on wikipedia. It tends to turn into a mess. One nice way to avoid the mess would be to set it a discussion page as a blog so each new comment is a separate post. +Look at a discussion page here or eg on wikipedia. It tends to turn into a +mess. One nice way to avoid the mess would be to set it a discussion page +as a blog so each new comment is a separate post. -One issue is, would there be a way to do this for all new discussion pages by default somehow? Setting up the blog means inserting a preprocessor directive; and that could somehow happen automatically when the discussion page is first created. (Creating a bunch of empty discussion pages with such directives ahead of time would be silly.) Maybe some kind of new page template system would do the trick, so pages matching */Discussion start off as a clone of DiscussionTemplate. Although the first person to -try to create the discussion page would still end up in an edit page with that template, which is not ideal. Hmm. +One issue is, would there be a way to do this for all new discussion pages +by default somehow? Setting up the blog means inserting a preprocessor +directive; and that could somehow happen automatically when the discussion +page is first created. (Creating a bunch of empty discussion pages with +such directives ahead of time would be silly.) Maybe some kind of new page +template system would do the trick, so pages matching */Discussion start +off as a clone of DiscussionTemplate. Although the first person to try to +create the discussion page would still end up in an edit page with that +template, which is not ideal. Hmm. -Another issue is that discussions really want to be threaded. Does that mean that a page like foo/discussion/question should have its own foo/discussion/question/(discussion?)/answer page? Of course, rss feeds don't handle threading, and of course doing this might be dependant on the issue above. Worrying about threading may be overkill.
\ No newline at end of file +Thinking about this some more, discussion links for pages that don't yet +have discussion could go directly to the ikiwiki cgi, which could provide a +post form, and create a new discussion page with the necessary inlining. + +Another issue is that discussions really want to be threaded. Does that +mean that a page like foo/discussion/question should have its own +foo/discussion/question/(discussion?)/answer page? Of course, rss feeds +don't handle threading, and of course doing this might be dependant on the +issue above. Worrying about threading may be overkill. |