diff options
author | Joey Hess <joey@kodama.kitenet.net> | 2008-09-17 14:27:31 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joey Hess <joey@kodama.kitenet.net> | 2008-09-17 14:27:31 -0400 |
commit | b540b263debef11d305b85f4dc85a6807b782810 (patch) | |
tree | 73c658cb7cf13ae2df52d83bdda64ac5ab4c2450 /doc/plugins | |
parent | fa4f735ad77417bf521b140fb872b8eb1f16552a (diff) |
aggregate: Allow expirecount to work on the first pass. (expireage still needs to wait for the pages to be rendered though)
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/plugins')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/plugins/aggregate/discussion.mdwn | 16 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/plugins/aggregate/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/aggregate/discussion.mdwn index 9077d7eb5..3b3d1ea3b 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/aggregate/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/aggregate/discussion.mdwn @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ I'm trying to set up a [planet of my users' blogs](http://help.schmonz.com/plane tag="schmonz" ]] - [[!aggregate + \[[!aggregate name="Amitai's photos" url="http://photos.schmonz.com/" dir="planet/schmonz-photos" @@ -26,6 +26,20 @@ I'm trying to set up a [planet of my users' blogs](http://help.schmonz.com/plane Two things aren't working as I'd expect: 1. `expirecount` doesn't take effect on the first run, but on the second. (This is minor, just a bit confusing at first.) + +> + 2. Where are the article bodies for e.g. David's and Nathan's blogs? The bodies aren't showing up in the `._aggregated` files for those feeds, but the bodies for my own blog do, which explains the planet problem, but I don't understand the underlying aggregation problem. (Those feeds include article bodies, and show up normally in my usual feed reader rss2email.) How can I debug this further? --[[schmonz]] + +> I only looked at David's, but its rss feed is not escaping the html +> inside the rss `description` tags, which is illegal for rss 2.0. These +> unknown tags then get ignored, including their content, and all that's +> left is whitespace. Escaping the html to `<` and `>` fixes the +> problem. You can see the feed validator complain about it here: +> <http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidj.org%2Frss.xml> +> +> It's sorta unfortunate that [[cpan XML::Feed]] doesn't just assume the +> un-esxaped html is part of the description field. Probably other feed +> parsers are more lenient. --[[Joey]] |