diff options
author | joey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071> | 2007-07-26 20:41:00 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | joey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071> | 2007-07-26 20:41:00 +0000 |
commit | e64442aa08c1d368f0ab3284016b0addb3ac4a67 (patch) | |
tree | c64d37e473213b20eafcbd955bf275b51b63e70c | |
parent | 2ff6e2455719f7dc550f8383ee9f952b35d38184 (diff) |
web commit by http://ethan.betacantrips.com/: I'm a year wiser; revise accordingly.
-rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/toplevel_index.mdwn | 41 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/toplevel_index.mdwn b/doc/todo/toplevel_index.mdwn index f749ad655..5adbaa7eb 100644 --- a/doc/todo/toplevel_index.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/toplevel_index.mdwn @@ -25,41 +25,6 @@ Here is a patch: > I would like to suggest another tack, namely a bigger, better special case. > The basic idea is that all indices of the form foo/bar/index get the wiki path foo/bar. -> This makes some things more elegant: -> -> * All files having to do with foo/bar are in the foo/bar directory, rather -> than the (admittedly minor) wart of having the index be in foo/. -> * This sort of addresses [[bugs/broken_parentlinks]] in that example/ is -> guaranteed to be a valid path. (There might be no index there, though.) -> * This is more in line with standard HTML practice, as far as I understand it, -> namely that linking to a/b means a/b/index.html rather than a/b.html. -> -> This would change the inline plugin in strange ways -- I think if foo/index.html -> contains \[[inline "* and !*/Discussion"]], it should skip inlining foo/index.html -> explicitly, but would inline index pages in child directories -> foo/bar/baz/index.html as bar/baz. -> -> It always bothers me that foo/bar/ files need a foo/bar.html in front of them, -> rather than a foo/bar/index.html, as is (to my mind) traditional. -> -> Ethan -> -> Hmm, now I've had time to think about this, and this does conflict pretty hard with foo.html/Discussion -> pages. Well, back to the drawing board. -> -> Well, it seems unlikely that you'll have both foo/bar.html and foo/bar/index.html, -> so why not accept either as foo/bar? This would both preserve backwards -> compatibility, as well as allow foo/bar/Discussion. -> -> Ethan -> -> No, in order for this to work, the wiki path foo/bar/baz could be any of: -> -> * foo/bar/baz.html -> * foo/index/bar/index/baz.html -> * foo/bar/index/baz.html -> * foo/bar/index/baz/index.html -> -> Or many others. Which is probably even hackier than having both foo.html and foo/. -> -> Ethan
\ No newline at end of file +> You could do this today using [[todo/index.html_allowed]], except that the toplevel +> page "index" becomes "", which causes all sorts of chaos. The discussion page would +> become /discussion, and the weird parentlinks behavior would go away. --Ethan
\ No newline at end of file |