diff options
| author | joey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071> | 2007-08-22 02:12:30 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | joey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071> | 2007-08-22 02:12:30 +0000 |
| commit | 5c3eb4ae5d819b53977772e77928aa4dc7e5de17 (patch) | |
| tree | b55d2a49a27d4b17838bf6a4d4db672ccd2105d4 | |
| parent | b78b8b81202a1fdb0c56dea01e88acdd9171c504 (diff) | |
more
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/latex.mdwn | 7 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/latex.mdwn b/doc/todo/latex.mdwn index f23f0a254..04eacbad4 100644 --- a/doc/todo/latex.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/latex.mdwn @@ -175,9 +175,14 @@ Okay, the last version of the tex plugin for ikiwiki can be downloaded [here](ht > I didn't break the checking code when I did it. It would be nice to write > a test case that tries to feed it bad code and makes sure it rejects it. > -> Question: does it really make sense to have an alt tag for the image +> Does it really make sense to have an alt tag for the image > that contains the tex code? Will that make any sense when browsing > without images? +> +> I'm thinking about renameing the preprocessor directive to teximg. +> \[[teximg code="" alt="foo"]] makes sense.. Would it make sense to rename +> the whole plugin, or do you think that other tex stuff should go in this +> same plugin? > > Note: I removed the style= attribute, since as I've told you, the > htmlsanitizer strips those since they can be used to insert javascript. I |