From 908e353a17006370eb6eb26b8bc703f60b0d82f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thiht <thiht44@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:42:29 +0100
Subject: Fix some links in the README (stmd -> CommonMark for the Git repo)
---
README.md | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 53aa3d9..a0615ad 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -189,13 +189,13 @@ There are only a few places where this spec says things that contradict
the canonical syntax description:
- It [allows all punctuation symbols to be
- backslash-escaped](http://jgm.github.io/stmd/spec.html#backslash-escapes),
+ backslash-escaped](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#backslash-escapes),
not just the symbols with special meanings in Markdown. I found
that it was just too hard to remember which symbols could be
escaped.
- It introduces an [alternative syntax for hard line
- breaks](http://jgm.github.io/stmd/spec.html#hard-line-breaks), a
+ breaks](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#hard-line-breaks), a
backslash at the end of the line, supplementing the
two-spaces-at-the-end-of-line rule. This is motivated by persistent
complaints about the “invisible” nature of the two-space rule.
@@ -205,11 +205,11 @@ the canonical syntax description:
quotes around a title in inline links, but not in reference links.
This kind of difference is really hard for users to remember, so the
spec [allows single quotes in both
- contexts](http://jgm.github.io/stmd/spec.html#links).
+ contexts](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#links).
- The rule for HTML blocks differs, though in most real cases it
shouldn't make a difference. (See
- [here](http://jgm.github.io/stmd/spec.html#html-blocks) for
+ [here](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#html-blocks) for
details.) The spec's proposal makes it easy to include Markdown
inside HTML block-level tags, if you want to, but also allows you to
exclude this. It is also makes parsing much easier, avoiding
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ the canonical syntax description:
- Rules for content in lists differ in a few respects, though (as with
HTML blocks), most lists in existing documents should render as
intended. There is some discussion of the choice points and
- differences [here](http://jgm.github.io/stmd/spec.html#motivation).
+ differences [here](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#motivation).
I think that the spec's proposal does better than any existing
implementation in rendering lists the way a human writer or reader
would intuitively understand them. (I could give numerous examples
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ the canonical syntax description:
- The start number of an ordered list is significant.
-- [Fenced code blocks](http://jgm.github.io/stmd/spec.html#fenced-code-blocks) are supported, delimited by either
+- [Fenced code blocks](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#fenced-code-blocks) are supported, delimited by either
backticks (` ``` `) or tildes (` ~~~ `).
In all of this, I have been guided by eight years experience writing
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ Contributing
There is a [forum for discussing
CommonMark](http://talk.commonmark.org); you should use it instead of
github issues for questions and possibly open-ended discussions.
-Use the [github issue tracker](http://github.com/jgm/stmd/issues)
+Use the [github issue tracker](http://github.com/jgm/CommonMark/issues)
only for simple, clear, actionable issues.
--
cgit v1.2.3