diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ actually running the tests, you can do: and you'll get all the tests in JSON format. -[The spec]: http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html +[The spec]: http://spec.commonmark.org/0.13/ The source of [the spec] is `spec.txt`. This is basically a Markdown file, with code examples written in a shorthand form: @@ -192,13 +192,13 @@ There are only a few places where this spec says things that contradict the canonical syntax description: - It [allows all punctuation symbols to be - backslash-escaped](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#backslash-escapes), + backslash-escaped](http://spec.commonmark.org/0.13/#backslash-escapes), not just the symbols with special meanings in Markdown. We found that it was just too hard to remember which symbols could be escaped. - It introduces an [alternative syntax for hard line - breaks](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#hard-line-breaks), a + breaks](http://spec.commonmark.org/0.13/#hard-line-breaks), a backslash at the end of the line, supplementing the two-spaces-at-the-end-of-line rule. This is motivated by persistent complaints about the “invisible” nature of the two-space rule. @@ -208,11 +208,11 @@ the canonical syntax description: quotes around a title in inline links, but not in reference links. This kind of difference is really hard for users to remember, so the spec [allows single quotes in both - contexts](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#links). + contexts](http://spec.commonmark.org/0.13/#links). - The rule for HTML blocks differs, though in most real cases it shouldn't make a difference. (See - [here](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#html-blocks) for + [here](http://spec.commonmark.org/0.13/#html-blocks) for details.) The spec's proposal makes it easy to include Markdown inside HTML block-level tags, if you want to, but also allows you to exclude this. It is also makes parsing much easier, avoiding @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ the canonical syntax description: - Rules for content in lists differ in a few respects, though (as with HTML blocks), most lists in existing documents should render as intended. There is some discussion of the choice points and - differences [here](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#motivation). + differences [here](http://spec.commonmark.org/0.13/#motivation). We think that the spec's proposal does better than any existing implementation in rendering lists the way a human writer or reader would intuitively understand them. (We could give numerous examples @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ the canonical syntax description: - The start number of an ordered list is significant. -- [Fenced code blocks](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#fenced-code-blocks) are supported, delimited by either +- [Fenced code blocks](http://spec.commonmark.org/0.13/#fenced-code-blocks) are supported, delimited by either backticks (```` ``` ```` or tildes (` ~~~ `). Contributing |